Common Ableist Terms You Might Be Using

Ableism (discrimination against disabled people) is unfortunately so prevalent in society that it has pervaded everyday language. People use this language without even thinking about its origins or the problem with its widespread use. I’ve compiled a list of some of the most common ableist words/phrases in an effort to both illustrate their prevalence and raise awareness for those interested in avoiding this language (and educating others!).

There are more comprehensive lists of ableist terms worth viewing (see the Additional Resources section listed at the end of this post). I’ve tried to focus on what might be considered the most common or surprising terms so you can start the process of eliminating this language.

Some of these terms are only considered ableist when they are used to reference a non-disabled condition (since it essentially compares the condition to that of a disabled person). It devalues the experience of the disabled person and makes the disabled condition less genuine.

Other terms in this list are considered ableist because they refer to disability in negative terms.

Some of these terms are so commonplace it may take some effort to remove them from your vocabulary. There are plenty of alternatives to use. First, take time to notice if you do use one of these terms. Correct yourself with an alternative phrase every time you notice it. Finally, look for opportunities to bring up the discussion about ableist language with others who may be unaware they use it.

For example, correcting someone after they have used an ableist term may not be the best way to teach them about ableism (or maybe it is!) since it could make them defensive, but there may also be other ways/times to raise awareness about ableism and disability.

Ableist Terms

Autistic–Fine to use to describe someone on the spectrum who prefers identity-first language, but not acceptable to use to describe someone who is NOT on the spectrum. Avoid saying someone is “acting autistic” or categorizing someone as “a little bit autistic.”

Deaf–Fine to use to describe someone who is a member of the Deaf community, but it diminishes the experience of someone who is Deaf when it is used casually to reference someone who is not Deaf.

Blind–If this isn’t being used to refer to a literal state of not being able to see (and instead referencing shortsightedness or mistakes and confusion from a lack of thoroughness), then this can also be an ableist term. For example, expressions like “Are you blind? Your glasses are on top of your head!” or in any statement where the term “blind” could be used interchangeably with ignorance can be problematic. This equates avoidance, common shortsightedness, or even intelligence to blindness.

Crazy, Bonkers, Insane, Lunatic, Psycho, Maniac, Cuckoo, Nuts–These all reference mental instability but are also used to describe common behavioral errors from individuals who do not exhibit mental illness.

Mad/Madman/Mad Scientist–See above.

Wheelchair-bound–Suggests that the wheelchair is a trap or a prison instead of an assistive mobility device. It emphasizes negative connotations around wheelchair usage rather than inclusivity and neutrality.

Lame–This term is used to describe something as feeble or unconvincing, a negative definition originating from the term referring to someone who cannot walk or has a leg or foot injury. Again, usage of this term suggests lameness is negative and equates physical disability with unconvincing rhetoric.

OCD–A diagnostic term that becomes problematic when used to describe someone who is not diagnosed with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder.

Bipolar–A diagnostic term that becomes problematic when used to describe someone who is not diagnosed with Bipolar Disorder.

Depressed–A diagnostic term that becomes problematic when used casually to describe someone who is not diagnosed with Depression or who does not exhibit authentic signs of Depression.

Dumb/Dumb things down–A term used to describe someone who is unable to speak in certain environments or situations. Suggesting the word ‘dumb’ relates to intelligence equates intellectual disability with the ability to speak, which is another form of ableism.

Spaz–This is a term used to describe someone with a spastic muscle condition, such as cerebral palsy, but is also used to casually reference erratic, hyper, or wild behavior.

Additional Resources

Ableism/Ableist Language by Autistic Hoya

Avoiding Ableist Language Augsburg

15 Crazy Examples Of Insanely Ableist Language by Parker Marie Molloy

These 9 Careless Things You Say Are Hurting People With Disabilities by Soumadri Banerjee

These 9 Careless Things You Say Are Hurting People With Disabilities by Soumadri Banerjee

Spread the word. Share this post!

9 Comments

  1. Graig D

    Reply

    How can you get diagnosed with depression if you’re not allowed to use the word “depressed”?

    It’s one thing to argue that the colloquial use of certain words is widely harmful to a marginalized group.

    It’s another thing to invalidate people’s disabilities and to suppress their agency to get the help they need. Language is important and nuanced and, for a site that should know that VERY well, this is dangerous disappointing to see. Undiagnosed depression is still depression. Please do better.

    • Jenna

      Reply

      Agreed! This is an important distinction. This article in no way meant to suggest that undiagnosed depression isn’t valid. I can see how the brief explanation used in this article might be construed that way…but the intentions of this article and the entire site run contrary to what you are suggesting here. I’ll revise so this is clearer. Thanks.

  2. Jack Smythe

    Reply

    Crazy, Bonkers, Insane, Lunatic, Psycho, Maniac, Cuckoo, Nuts

    Maniac is also a term of praise amongst natives from the state of Maine. no ableism at all.

  3. Naughty Autie

    Reply

    “Blinded by something (or turning a blind eye)–This equates avoidance or common shortsightedness to blindness.”

    Really? Because I thought that the phrase “Turning a blind eye to X” meant deliberately not seeing something, whereas blindness/partial sightedness are, by definition, not deliberate. Also, if light is bright enough, one can be blinded by it. As personal experience in the past informs me. It seems to me that, like Lydia X.Z. Brown’s blogpost on the same subject, this article lacks in context and nuance.

    • Jenna

      Reply

      Great points! I think discussions about context and nuance are important. I’ve tried to teach my kids about ableist language at very young ages so they are making respectful choices, even when they don’t understand the nuances. Because people’s opinions vary too, it’s best to always confirm, when possible, individual choices and preferences of whomever you are around. I think people sometimes default to avoiding the most basic comparisons to disabilities in an effort to be respectful, but I totally agree that language is nuanced and that discussion is important. Thanks for commenting.

      • Naughty Autie

        Reply

        By the way, I would like to correct one sentence in my previous comment, as it’s quite ambiguous the way it currently is.

        “Also, if light is bright enough, one can be blinded by it, as personal experience in the past informs me.”

  4. Reply

    I’m writing a children’s novel and want to avoid ableist language. I know it’s wrong to say “spaz” (of course), but what about the term jerk? As in, “He was being such a jerk.” Seems like a pre-teen would speak that way, but should I avoid the term?

  5. Sheogorath

    Reply

    “Blinded by something (or turning a blind eye)–This equates avoidance or common shortsightedness to blindness.”

    Really? Because I’m short-sighted and I know a blind man, and neither of us are offended by these terms. As Naughty Autie pointed out, people can be literally blinded by things and the phrase “turning a blind eye to…” indicates a deliberate state of not seeing, which is not the case for either myself or my friend, rendering these phrases neutral at worst, and certainly not ableist. May I repeat Naughty Autie’s request for added nuance?

    • Jenna

      Reply

      Thanks for your comment! Agreed that nuance is needed. This is a very brief article and any of these terms could have their own devoted to it. I made some revisions based on your feedback. Open to more if you have them!

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.